The aim of this paper (arXiv:1705.04672), with E. Grenier, is to investigate the stability of Prandtl boundary layers in the vanishing viscosity limit: . In his CPAM2000 paper, Grenier proved that there exists no Prandtl’s asymptotic expansion involving one Prandtl’s boundary layer with thickness of order , which describes the inviscid limit of Navier-Stokes equations. The instability gives rise to a viscous boundary sublayer whose thickness is of order . In this paper, we point out how the stability of the classical Prandtl’s layer is linked to the stability of this sublayer. In particular, we prove that the two layers cannot both be nonlinearly stable in . That is, either the Prandtl’s layer or the boundary sublayer is nonlinearly unstable in the sup norm.

## Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

## Sublayer of Prandtl boundary layers

Posted in boundary layers, fluid dynamics, Instabilities, Uncategorized on May 14, 2017| Leave a Comment »

## Sharp bounds on linear semigroup of Navier Stokes with boundary layer norms

Posted in boundary layers, fluid dynamics, Uncategorized on March 2, 2017| Leave a Comment »

I’ve just uploaded this paper, with E. Grenier, on the arXiv (arXiv:1703.00881), entitled *Sharp bounds on linear semigroup of Navier Stokes with boundary layer norms*, aiming a better understanding of the classical Prandtl’s boundary layers. Indeed, one of the key difficulties in dealing with boundary layers is the creation of (unbounded) vorticity in the inviscid limit.

## Graduate student seminar: Kinetic theory of gases

Posted in Kinetic theory, Uncategorized on January 28, 2017| Leave a Comment »

Lat week, I gave a graduate student seminar, whose purpose is to introduce to first and second year graduate students (at Penn State) an active and beautiful topics of research, and suggest a few possible ideas for students’ presentation later in the semester. Here are slides of my talk, which focuses on Kinetic Theory of Gases, a topics that I will teach as a graduate topics course, next fall (2017).

## The Maxwell-Boltzmann approximation for ion kinetic modeling

Posted in Uncategorized on June 18, 2016| Leave a Comment »

In this short paper with C. Bardos, F. Golse, and R. Sentis, we are aimed to justify the Maxwell-Boltzmann approximation from kinetic models, widely used in the literature for electrons density distribution; namely, the relation

in which denote the electrons density, the elementary charge, the electron temperature, and the electric potential.

## Math 505, Mathematical Fluid Mechanics: Notes 1

Posted in fluid dynamics, Uncategorized on January 11, 2016| 1 Comment »

This Spring ’16 semester, I am teaching a graduate Math 505 course, whose goal is to introduce the basic concepts and the fundamental mathematical problems in Fluid Mechanics for students both in math and engineering. The difficulty is to assume no background in both fluids and analysis of PDEs from the students. That’s it!

## On the spectral instability of parallel shear flows

Posted in Uncategorized on November 29, 2015| Leave a Comment »

This short note is to be published as the proceeding of a Laurent Schwartz PDE seminar talk that I gave last May at IHES, announcing our recent results (on channel flows and boundary layers), which provide a complete mathematical proof of the viscous destabilization phenomenon, pointed out by Heisenberg (1924), C.C. Lin and Tollmien (1940s), among other prominent physicists. Precisely, we construct growing modes of the linearized Navier-Stokes equations about general stationary shear flows in a bounded channel (channel flows) or on a half-space (boundary layers), for sufficiently large Reynolds number $R \to \infty$. Such an instability is linked to the emergence of Tollmien-Schlichting waves in describing the early stage of the transition from laminar to turbulent flows. In fact, the material in this note is only the first half of what I spoke on that day, skipping the steady case!

## On wellposedness of Prandtl: a contradictory claim?

Posted in Uncategorized on November 18, 2015| Leave a Comment »

Yesterday, Nov 17, Xu and Zhang posted a preprint on the ArXiv, entitled “Well-posedness of the Prandtl equation in Sobolev space without monotonicity” (arXiv:1511.04850), claiming to prove what the title says. This immediately causes some concern or possible contrary to what has been known previously! Here, monotonicity is of the horizontal velocity component in the normal direction to the boundary. It’s well-known that monotonicity implies well-posedness of Prandtl (e.g., Oleinik in the 60s; see this previous post for Prandtl equations). It is then first proved by Gerard-Varet and Dormy that without monotonicity, the Prandtl equation is linearly illposed (and some followed-up works on the nonlinear case that I wrote with Gerard-Varet, and then with Guo). Is there a contradictory to what it’s known and this new preprint of Xu and Zhang? The purpose of this blog post is to clarify this.