As an analogue of the previous post dealing with the classical particles, in this post, I shall formally discuss how similar models for quantum particles arrive. These particles behave like a wave and their dynamics is governed by the Schrödinger equation. We start the chapter with some basic quantum mechanics.

Posted in Kinetic theory, Math 597C: Graduate topics course on Kinetic Theory, Quantum kinetic theory | Tagged Gross-Pitaevskii equations, Hartree equations, quantum Boltzmann, Schrodinger | Leave a Comment »

One of the beautiful results in kinetic theory is to construct the global classical solution to the 3D Vlasov-Poisson system. The result is now classical; see, for instance, chapter 4 of Glassey‘s book. However, I feel the result is a bit non-trivial to convey to students and beginners. Would you agree? Anyway, this post is to try to present this classical result, aiming to be as pedagogical as possible, with the original the good, the bad, and the ugly proof of J. Schaeffer ’91.

Posted in Kinetic theory, Math 597C: Graduate topics course on Kinetic Theory | Tagged Vlasov-Poisson | Leave a Comment »

This fall of 2017, I teach a graduate topics course on Kinetic Theory of Gases. The idea is to introduce the foundation of kinetic theory starting from classical mechanics (and also, basic quantum mechanics!), to survey some classical results on both collisional and collisionless kinetic models, and to detail a few selected mathematical topics in the field. The materials are based on several books, papers, and online resources, which I shall mention in the text. Periodically, I shall post my lecture notes for the course here on this blog (email me for a full pdf copy, with figures and precise references).

Posted in Kinetic theory, Math 597C: Graduate topics course on Kinetic Theory | Tagged BBGKY hierarchy, Boltzmann equations, Liouville's equations, Mean field equations, Vlasov | 2 Comments »

I’ve just submitted this paper with Grenier (ENS Lyon) which studies Prandtl’s boundary layer asymptotic expansions for incompressible fluids on the half-space in the inviscid limit. In 1904, Prandtl introduced his well known boundary layers in order to describe the transition from Navier-Stokes to Euler equations in the inviscid limit.

Posted in boundary layers, fluid dynamics, Instabilities, New papers | Leave a Comment »

Emmanuel Grenier and I have just submitted this 84-page! long paper, also posted on arxiv (arXiv:1705.05323). This work is a continuation and completion of the program (initiated in Grenier-Toan1 and Grenier-Toan2) to derive pointwise estimates on the Green function and sharp bounds on the semigroup of linearized Navier-Stokes around a stationary boundary layer profile.

Posted in boundary layers, fluid dynamics, Instabilities | Leave a Comment »

The aim of this paper (arXiv:1705.04672), with E. Grenier, is to investigate the stability of Prandtl boundary layers in the vanishing viscosity limit: . In his CPAM2000 paper, Grenier proved that there exists no Prandtl’s asymptotic expansion involving one Prandtl’s boundary layer with thickness of order , which describes the inviscid limit of Navier-Stokes equations. The instability gives rise to a viscous boundary sublayer whose thickness is of order . In this paper, we point out how the stability of the classical Prandtl’s layer is linked to the stability of this sublayer. In particular, we prove that the two layers cannot both be nonlinearly stable in . That is, either the Prandtl’s layer or the boundary sublayer is nonlinearly unstable in the sup norm.

Posted in boundary layers, fluid dynamics, Instabilities, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

I’ve just uploaded this paper, with E. Grenier, on the arXiv (arXiv:1703.00881), entitled *Sharp bounds on linear semigroup of Navier Stokes with boundary layer norms*, aiming a better understanding of the classical Prandtl’s boundary layers. Indeed, one of the key difficulties in dealing with boundary layers is the creation of (unbounded) vorticity in the inviscid limit.

Posted in boundary layers, fluid dynamics, Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »